I saw them cross the twilight of an age, The sun-eyed children of a marvellous dawn, The great creators with wide brows of calm, The massive barrier-breakers of the world
20/09/2021
Conveniently, the assigned labels of jabbed versus unjabbed fits the totalitarian model of divide and conquer perfectly.
As more of humanity awakens, the range of societal problems that are purposely generating devastating harm and destruction connected to authoritarian power abuses and monstrous crimes against humanity has become increasingly evident. How can it be that so many reasonable, intelligent and good-hearted humans became grossly enmeshed in the controlled narrative and further were unable to discern egregious lies and gaslighting tactics used to perpetuate and accept these many global crimes being made against humanity? The old 3D paradigm and its control narratives are sinking fast, which means an incredible amount of data dumps filled with much more difficult disclosure related information will continue to explode into the surface view for more people to see. This will be a difficult time for many humans to mentally and emotionally process this ongoing rabbit hole of painful disclosure information revealing the brutal facts of those who have orchestrated these crimes and those who accepted the bribes to go along with the anti-human agenda. During this transition, those already awakened will find themselves being put into positions of giving reinforcement and moral support to others when they come to realize what is actually happening.
Labels:
COVID&SHOTS,
DISCLOSURE,
FUTURE,
LISA RENEE,
TRANSITION/AWAKENING
18/09/2021
16/09/2021
Ethics professor delivers emotional lesson on vaccine mandates
Dr. Ponesse is being forced by her faculty to be injected immediately by the experimental mRNA gene therapies. She is refusing with painful consequences...
Labels:
CENSORSHIP,
COVID&SHOTS,
ETHICS,
HEALTH/HEALING,
PHILOSOPHY,
VIDEO
A pharmacological method of making people love their servitude - The jab as a long-term business model
There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.
- Aldous Huxley
DR. MICHAEL PALMER/CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS INTERVIEW - UNDERSTANDING MEDICAL & ECONOMIC COVID MOTIVES
'Largely inaccurate tripe': Al Gore's 'An Inconvenient Truth', fifteen years on
https://www.sott.net/article/458282-Largely-inaccurate-tripe-Al-Gores-An-Inconvenient-Truth-fifteen-years-on
Anyhow, I think we can all agree that Gore's claims are more outlandish than an Extinction Rebellion protest. But the climate alarmists are not stupid, and they have learnt from their mistakes. Although they have not toned down their hyperbole, they realised they needed a more convenient person to make these outlandish claims.
You see, Gore was the Greta of his day. The difference, however, was that Gore, as a former politician, was not impervious to criticism. The climate alarmists learnt that it is better to have a teenage schoolgirl, who is beyond reproach, as your mouthpiece rather than a crusty former politician. It's all very sinister when you think about it.
Nevertheless, it may be fifteen years on and many of Gore's claims have turned out to be hyperbolic hogwash, but that hasn't stopped the climate alarmists from making similar claims. And I really do hope I am around in fifteen years to write another piece about how the scare stories that emanate from Greta also amount to nothing. That is if I am not burnt to a crisp or under water by then, which, somehow, I very much doubt will be the case.
Al Gore's climate change movie was hailed as revolutionary a decade and a half ago when it was released to much fanfare but, in the intervening years, the truths have, inconveniently, turned out to not be truths at all.
I remember that when I became a member of the European Parliament's Environment Committee, over a decade ago now, I was sent a copy of both the DVD and the book. I think it was designed to be our Bible, especially when fear-mongering about global warming...which the committee did over and over again. I then stopped going.
But the movie wasn't just aimed at adults, or gullible MEPs, it was designed to scare our children. Schools around the world showed the movie and the complimentary book appeared in their libraries. As a result, children became terrified of the impending climate doom, which led to 'climate anxiety' and even now is giving our little ones sleepless nights.
However, the wheels quickly started to come off An Inconvenient Truth. In 2007, the High Court of England and Wales ruled that the film contained nine scientific inaccuracies relating to "the context of alarmism and exaggeration." From that point onwards, schools had to provide a counterbalance to the 'one sided' arguments contained in the film.
Anyway, I digress. I wanted to write this piece to mark the fifteenth anniversary of An Inconvenient Truth's release and see how some of Gore's apocalyptic predictions stand up today. I have chosen three - but could have covered many, many more.
Fifteen years ago today, failed US presidential candidate, Al Gore, released what can be best described as a scare movie called 'An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming And What We Can Do About It'. The movie was a global hit and Gore won an Oscar; he also received the Nobel Peace Prize.
Gore had succeeded in making global warming sexy. Everyone wanted to get in on the act to show how eco-friendly they were, particularly celebrities. And everyone else had to sign up to the agenda because, as we still hear so often today, "the science is settled."
Gore had succeeded in making global warming sexy. Everyone wanted to get in on the act to show how eco-friendly they were, particularly celebrities. And everyone else had to sign up to the agenda because, as we still hear so often today, "the science is settled."
But the movie wasn't just aimed at adults, or gullible MEPs, it was designed to scare our children. Schools around the world showed the movie and the complimentary book appeared in their libraries. As a result, children became terrified of the impending climate doom, which led to 'climate anxiety' and even now is giving our little ones sleepless nights.
However, the wheels quickly started to come off An Inconvenient Truth. In 2007, the High Court of England and Wales ruled that the film contained nine scientific inaccuracies relating to "the context of alarmism and exaggeration." From that point onwards, schools had to provide a counterbalance to the 'one sided' arguments contained in the film.
Anyway, I digress. I wanted to write this piece to mark the fifteenth anniversary of An Inconvenient Truth's release and see how some of Gore's apocalyptic predictions stand up today. I have chosen three - but could have covered many, many more.
You see, Gore was the Greta of his day. The difference, however, was that Gore, as a former politician, was not impervious to criticism. The climate alarmists learnt that it is better to have a teenage schoolgirl, who is beyond reproach, as your mouthpiece rather than a crusty former politician. It's all very sinister when you think about it.
Nevertheless, it may be fifteen years on and many of Gore's claims have turned out to be hyperbolic hogwash, but that hasn't stopped the climate alarmists from making similar claims. And I really do hope I am around in fifteen years to write another piece about how the scare stories that emanate from Greta also amount to nothing. That is if I am not burnt to a crisp or under water by then, which, somehow, I very much doubt will be the case.
Labels:
CENSORSHIP,
CLIMATE CHANGE,
CONSERVATION,
FUTURE,
WORLD
15/09/2021
11/09/2021
10/09/2021
A 90 day period of time where we need to adjust ourselves accordingly to where we need to be in placement relative to this transition >> March 2022
Right now we face the energies of death on this global scale; there is ego death and there is physical death at a global scale. Now, with all of our spiritual might we dig deep into our hearts and souls and we connect with our inner spirit for our love for God, for humanity and Christ, our love for all living creatures on this earth. We must say with authority in our stance here me now: “There is no death”. Our consciousness is eternal and from one dimension to another we transit. Some will transition to another dimension dropping their current physical body and others will not. Yet remember no matter what it looks like they will still be transitioning with us to a higher plane of existence. As we know the planet is ascending.
Nothing can and nothing will stop this from happening.
Labels:
ASCENSION,
DEATH/DYING,
DISCLOSURE,
FREEDOM,
FUTURE,
LISA RENEE,
MYSTICISM,
TRANSITION/AWAKENING,
TRUTH
07/09/2021
(B) Are we going to be as vulnerable as I think we are going to be upon arrival in 4th density? I mean, we will be the new kids on the block!
A: Are you not already pretty damn vulnerable?
Q: (L) Well, yes we are already pretty vulnerable. Are we going to be MORE vulnerable?
A: What fear have ye, if ye remember that the soul is what counts, and that it is indestructible. Good night.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)